Année : 2022
Company: Paps logistics
Mon rôle : Lead UX Designer
The team: Product Manager, Product Owner, Junior UX Designer
Tools Postman, Confluence, Google Slides, Figjam

TL;DR

  • Challenge: 70% of prospects abandoned API integration mid-process, causing 60% of dev team time to be spent on support.
  • Role: Lead UX from discovery to delivery. Research, architecture, writing, validation.
  • Solutions: Developer-first Postman docs, CMS-specific visual guides, Sales enablement material.
  • Results: -40% dev support time, +20% API success rate, +15% customer retention.

The Challenge: High Friction, Low Success

As e-commerce adoption accelerated in Francophone Africa, Paps‘ API became critical for merchants. But integration wasn’t smooth:

  • 70% of prospects abandoned mid-integration.
  • Dev team spent 60% of their time on support
  • 3-4 weeks average integration time

This friction directly impacted business: delayed sales, lost deals, and team overload.

Understanding the Context

  • Company: Paps, West Africa’s leading on-demand delivery service (Google & Alibaba-backed).
  • Problem: The API docs were written by devs, for devs. Business users and CMS integrators were left behind.
  • Result: Exploding support tickets (+300% in 6 months) and unclear ownership across teams.

Research & Discovery: 3 Audiences, 3 Needs

Primary Research:

  • 15 client interviews (devs, business owners, tech managers)
  • 8 internal interviews (sales, devs, support)
  • 5 shadowing sessions with prospects

Secondary Research:

  • Competitive audit of 3 API docs
  • 50+ support tickets analyzed
  • Doc UX & devtool best practices

Professional Developers (40%)

"I need clean, complete docs I can trust."
Goals
  • Fast integration
  • Fewer back-and-forths
Pain Points
  • Missing endpoints
  • Outdated examples

CMS Users (45%)

"I'm not technical, but I need this to work for my business."
Goals
  • Step-by-step guidance
  • Platform-specific help
Pain Points
  • Tech jargon
  • No-code gaps

Sales Team (15%)

"I need to pitch the API with confidence."
Goals
  • Capability clarity
  • Implementation timelines
Pain Points
  • Can’t answer technical questions

How Might We… ?

Make API integration accessible to non-devs?

Reduce overload during integration?

Serve multiple audiences without overwhelm?

Enable confident sales conversations?

Design Principles

  1. Progressive disclosure: Show the right info at the right time
  2. Context-aware content: Match content to user goals
  3. Learning by doing: Interactive and scenario-based
  4. Outcome-first: Show business value early

Information Architecture by Persona

Developer Journey:
Technical depth
Implementation
Testing
Production
CMS Journey:
Platform choice
Setup
Config
Validation
Sales Journey:
Capabilities
Common Qs
Selling timeline

Solution 1: Developer Docs in Postman

Goal: Provide complete, testable, trusted docs

Design Decisions:

  • Chose Postman for its interactive testing capabilities
  • Structured content using progressive disclosure
  • Added real-world scenarios and edge cases
  • Included comprehensive error handling guides

Outcome: This became our primary technical reference, reducing developer questions by 60%.

Solution 2: CMS Visual Docs in Confluence

Goal: Empower non-technical users

Design:

  • Platform-specific (WordPress, Shopify, PrestaShop)
  • Screenshot walkthroughs
  • Plain-language explanations

Tested documentation with 8 CMS users through moderated usability sessions, achieving 85% task completion rate.

Solution 3: Sales Enablement

Goal: Turn hand-offs into confident conversations

Assets Created:

  • Slide deck linking features to use cases
  • FAQ database with clear language
  • Qualification framework to match user needs

Training:

  • 3 sessions delivered
  • Quick-reference sheets created

Testing & Iteration

Each doc set was tested with its target audience:

  • Devs tested Postman
  • CMS users tested visual guides
  • Sales tested training kit

Insight: CMS users needed stronger business-context links.
Action: Enhanced visual guides + more onboarding support.

Results & Impact

Quantitative results:

-40%
reduction in developer team support time
(from ~24 hours/week to 14 hours/week)
-30%
decrease in CMS user help requests
(from 50 tickets/month to 35 tickets/month)
+20%
increase in successful API integrations
(from 30% to 50% of prospects)
+15%
improvement in customer retention rate

Qualitative results:

“Now I feel more confident in conversations with technical prospects. It’s easier to talk to them. And clients almost do everything by themselves.” Sales agent.

Business Impact:

  • Devs now build features instead of answering tickets
  • NPS up from 6.2 to 7.8

Key Learnings

What worked:

  • Research for multiple audiences
  • Close collab with devs = high accuracy
  • Iteration with real users

What I’d improve:

  • Earlier lo-fi prototyping
  • Better baseline metrics
  • Longer-term feedback loops

Skills reinforced:

  • Multi-audience technical writing
  • Cross-team enablement
  • Outcome-first communication

Réflexion

This project challenged me to apply UX design principles to a traditionally developer-focused domain. The key insight was recognizing that API documentation is ultimately a user interface and it needs to be designed with the same attention to user needs, context, and goals as any other product experience.

The success of this project demonstrated that UX design principles can create value in unexpected places, and that sometimes the most impactful design work happens behind the scenes, enabling others to succeed.